should thrillho be un-banned?

poll

If he wants to come back, on the condition that he'll fucking grow a pair and stop complaining, then I'd have no problem. Otherwise, I'd prefer that whiny shit STFO

I'm not against it. If he wants, and can abide by the minor few rules this place has, yeah let him back.

does he even want to be unbanned?

idk SS88, I warned him numerous times to stop spamming the board but he just bitched some more.

Un-ban him so I can then re-ban him and everyone else then ban me.

I got my SPAM 'O' RAMA ready to go.

Emil Beaulieau wrote:Un-ban him so I can then re-ban him and everyone else then ban me.

I got my SPAM 'O' RAMA ready to go.

I'm starting to think you're thrillho himself.
Or maybe just an incredibly bored kid?

They're not thrillho, I have yet to see a bunch of scatporn. They're just trolling, is what I think.

Emil has only posted a few times (a long while ago) about things other than "unban thrillho" so I really don't see why he thinks it so important to unban thrillho in the 1st place. Why would it matter if he's not even an active poster?

i think it is important. & i believe since the vote is not UNANIMOUS then he should be unbanned or only a UNANIMOUSvote should uphold the previous ruling. so there should be a revote. i think a UNANIMOUS vote is a consensus vote but a single dissenting vote is NOT a consensus vote:

JUSTICA PARA THRILLO. unban this homo!!!

Amazing how someone who hasn't even posted here in a while has been such a hot topic for debate.

You'd think if he wanted to post here, he'd make an account under another email or sign-up as a quest, yes? Obviously he hasn't done that (not that I've seen), so why not just give it a fucking rest?

symbolic dude. just get banned on a noise forum & see how YOU feel.

when i am DONE w/ my grassroots facebook campaign there will be more Yes votes than No votes anydamnway.

peace.

Fuckers, I know thrillho, he is not a bored, kid or a homo hater, you are stupid for editing his posts, totally false advertising anarchy my ass...you mean facism dont you..this is my only post I hate your shitty bored, you lied when you said anything goes...so fuck you and this stupid board...oh and Im not thrillho....fuckers

i dont have time to be a dick to you guys...

need one more YES to make this bitch EVEN.

whatever wrote:Fuckers, I know thrillho, he is not a bored, kid or a homo hater, you are stupid for editing his posts, totally false advertising anarchy my ass...you mean facism dont you..this is my only post I hate your shitty bored, you lied when you said anything goes...so fuck you and this stupid board...oh and Im not thrillho....fuckers

Look. What is the forum called? Harsh Fuck. Little to do with Anarchy. Sure, 10564 said he wanted "freedom in an anarchist-style setting," but did you really expect there to be a true "anarchy?"

If this board was truly anarchic, there would be no mods or admins, not even representative ones; there wouldn't be enough order to form sub-topics or any other beneficial features/courtesies; shit (literally and figuratively) would be tossed-around with no rhyme or reason... In essence, if he (10564) or any of the other admins intended true anarchy, it'd be pointless since everyone could and would do anything rellevant or irrelevant they wanted to.

Call me a hypocrite, but I like a little structure in my freedom. One can never be truly "free" on the internet anyways, because its always subject to certain laws; whether you're in China and have a vice grip on your nuts, or in the U.K. where the mere mention of the word "loli" gets your ass fined beyond triple digits, there's always some form of moderation on the internet.

As for the post editing, I haven't seen it. If its there, then yeah, not the best call. I can understand deleting a post for various legal or toher issues, but editing the actual words of another individual is something I'm strongly opposed to.

But will I leave the board if I find it? Fuck no! Because I like the people here and enjoy talking to them, reagrdless of their beliefs. I'm not ignoring bullshit when it stares in my face, but if its thrillho's bullshit, or the bullshit form any oher annoying little fuck whining about the board's rules, then, well, tough shit: I could care less.

man, durrhurr seems like a total dipshit tool

okay this shit is 7 to 5 in favor to UNBAN.

red FAGwave wrote:man, durrhurr seems like a total dipshit tool

Just the regular dipshit poet you know and love, haha.

less_cunning wrote:okay this shit is 7 to 5 in favor to UNBAN.

Someone is multi-accounting just to vote "un-ban" (or inviting their friends to join just to vote).

Posters who post without a reason (aside from pissing others off) do NOT deserve to be here. This board isn't about pissing off other noisers (or musicians of any sort, or anyone that comes here and contributes to the forum).

There is basically one rule, do not intentionally piss others off here. So, NO TROLLING.

This has/had been a continuous problem with Thrillho. They were not contributing to the board, and YES, a post got edited by a user-rank-admin at some point. That was our mistake. We should have just added a little note, instead of changing what he had said.

People who post just to see this board fall need to get a life.

We don't expect everyone to get along. We don't expect everyone to always be friendly.

This IS a place where people who find common interest come to chat and contribute/share their experiences with others.

We have a section for "complete nonsense". Complete Nonsense does not mean trolling either.

We have had a nice little "tight-knit" community here. When I sign in, personally, I enjoy seeing the same people posting, aside from the trolls.

We may not be "anarchist", but we are not extremely strict about posts either.

If you don't like it, what is the point of making others miserable with your presence (by posting the same shit over and over all over the forum, under different headlines, just to troll)?

I'm not sure what else I've got to say on this matter (at the moment).

- - -
I do NOT speak for 10564; these are MY thoughts on the issue ( as unorganized as they may be =/ ).

well said, Mouka.

that someone is ME. yes i did those things. & i can LEAVE you don't have to ban me.

i thought thrillho's tactics were dumb. but maybe it looks like in the long-run he was actually RIGHT.

"thrillho's tactics" for what? Right about what? Leave if you want. I feel like if I ban you I'll come across as a dick and if I don't then you very well may just keep doing what you're doing to the board.

What good was inviting people to cast their vote? It was immediately obvious that the votes were thrown off. I mean, before I linked you to this thread, the votes for yes were at zero, and then afterwords they shot up to 8 in less than 24 hours? How much more obvious can it get?